OutcomeWrite an offer with a fixed scope and a fixed price.
Hourly pricing punishes you for getting faster, which is the whole point of what you just learned. Price the outcome.
A workable offer has four parts: who it's for (specific enough to exclude people), what they get (deliverables, not activities), what it costs (one number), how long it takes (a date). Example shape: "AI content system for local wellness studios: voice profile, prompt library, 30-day content bank and a follow-up workflow. Two weeks. $X."
On the number: beginners underprice, then resent the work, then deliver badly. Price where you'd be glad to do it well. If nobody objects to your price, it's too low.
Scope boundaries are the difference between a good offer and a nightmare. Write what's not included as explicitly as what is. Every horror story in service work starts with a scope that was never written down.
Drill30 min
Write your offer on one page: who, what, how much, how long, what is excluded. Read it to someone who would never buy it and ask what they think they would be getting. Their answer tells you what is unclear.
Prompt: Package one offer
Help me package one offer.
WHAT I CAN DO: [the specific capability]
WHO NEEDS IT: [be specific: an industry, a size, a situation]
WHAT IT'S WORTH TO THEM: [the outcome in their terms]
MY SPEED: [how long it actually takes you]
Produce a one-page offer:
- Who it's for (specific enough that some people are excluded)
- The outcome, in their language not mine
- Deliverables: things they receive, not activities I perform
- Timeline with a real date
- Price, as one number
- WHAT'S NOT INCLUDED: be thorough, this is the part that prevents disasters
Then: 3 objections I'll hear, and how I'd answer each honestly.
Push back if my price looks too low for the value described.
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every [bracketed] placeholder with your own details first, then review the edited prompt before you send it.
Your First Three Clients
30 min
OutcomeFill the pipeline from people you already know.
Your first three clients are almost never strangers. They come from people who already trust you, and the reason people struggle here is that they'd rather cold-message a stranger than tell their own network they're doing something new. Cold outreach feels safer because rejection from a stranger doesn't cost anything.
The move: list twenty people who know you and run a business or work somewhere with a marketing problem. Not "who would buy this," because you're a bad judge of that. Then message them individually with the thing you built, not the thing you're selling."I built a follow-up system that stopped me losing leads. Took an afternoon. Want me to show you what it looks like?"
Show, then offer. Not a pitch, a demonstration of something real that you made. The first three clients buy your competence, which they can only see if you show them something.
Do the first one cheap or free in exchange for a real testimonial and permission to describe the results. Real proof beats a higher first invoice.
Drill30 min
Write the twenty names. Message five today. Not a pitch, an offer to show them something. Five messages is twenty minutes and it is the actual bottleneck between you and your first client.
Prompt: First three clients
Help me get my first three clients from people I already know.
MY OFFER: [paste the one-pager from the last lesson]
MY NETWORK: [describe who you know: industries, roles, how you know them]
1. Give me the criteria for who belongs on a list of 20, and tell me who I'm likely to wrongly exclude.
2. Write the individual outreach message. Under 80 words. It should SHOW something I built, not pitch what I sell.
3. Write the follow-up for people who say "interesting" and go quiet.
4. Write what I say when someone asks "what does it cost" before they've seen anything.
5. Tell me exactly what to offer client #1 in exchange for a testimonial and permission to share results.
Voice: [paste voice profile]. No hype. These people know me.
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every [bracketed] placeholder with your own details first, then review the edited prompt before you send it.
Teach It: The Duplication Play
45 min
OutcomeTrain someone else to do this without becoming their help desk.
Teaching is a high-leverage path and the one people execute worst, because they teach the way they learned: enthusiastically, in a firehose, all at once. The learner nods, feels overwhelmed and does nothing.
What works is one skill, one win, one week. Week one, they build a voice profile and produce something they'd actually publish. That's it. A person who gets one real result comes back. A person who receives nine modules of context in a two-hour video call does not.
Hand over assets, not information. Your voice-profile prompt, your prompt library, your tracking sheet: the things they can use immediately. Information they can get anywhere; your working system is what's scarce.
And design the support boundary before you need it: a weekly group call, not unlimited individual questions. Unbounded support is how teaching turns into an unpaid help desk and why most people quit teaching.
Build session45 min, set aside a block
Take one person through Module 02 of this program this week. Watch where they get stuck. It will not be where you expect. That is your curriculum feedback, and it is worth more than any planning.
Prompt: Training plan for one person
Design a training plan to take one person from zero to their first real result.
THEIR STARTING POINT: [what they know now, probably nothing]
THEIR BUSINESS: [what they're trying to grow]
TIME THEY HAVE: [realistically, per week]
Give me:
1. Week 1: the ONE skill, and the ONE visible win they get from it
2. Weeks 2-4: one skill and one win each
3. The exact assets I hand them on day one
4. The support boundary: what I'll answer, how, and how often
5. The signal that tells me they're going to stick with it, and the signal that tells me they aren't
CONSTRAINT: week 1 must produce something they'd actually use or publish. If they don't get a real result in week 1, they quit. Design backward from that.
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every [bracketed] placeholder with your own details first, then review the edited prompt before you send it.
Staying Legal and Credible
30 min
OutcomeShip AI-assisted marketing without creating liability.
The rules aren't complicated; they're just ignored until someone gets a letter. Five that cover most exposure:
Substantiate claims before you make them. Anything about results, income or effectiveness needs evidence you could produce if asked. AI-generated confidence is not evidence.
Testimonials must be real, and typical, or labeled. Real words from real people. If a result is unusual, say so clearly and nearby, not in a footnote.
Disclose material connections. Affiliate relationships, free product, your distributor status. Clearly and close to the claim, not buried in a bio.
Health claims are a bright line. Saying a product treats, cures, prevents or mitigates a disease moves it into a regulated category. Wellness language is not the same thing, and the difference is worth understanding precisely for whatever you sell.
Disclose AI where it would matter to a reasonable person. A generated image of a "customer," a synthetic voice, an automated message presented as personal. The disclosure costs you nothing; being caught costs you everything.
Put these in your project instructions so they're enforced by default rather than by memory. And treat your company's policies and current FTC guidance as authoritative over anything in this program, including this lesson, which is not legal advice.
Drill30 min
Run the compliance audit prompt on your three most-visible published pieces. Fix what it finds. Then paste the five rules into your project instructions so the next draft starts compliant.
Prompt: Marketing compliance audit
Audit my marketing for compliance risk.
CONTENT: [paste, or list your main published pieces]
MY SITUATION: [e.g. independent distributor, freelancer, coach, small business owner, plus your industry]. Subject to FTC endorsement and advertising rules, and to [any company or industry policy that applies].
Flag every instance of:
1. Income or earnings claims, including implied ones
2. Health claims: treats, cures, prevents, diagnoses, mitigates
3. Testimonials without substantiation or a typicality disclosure
4. Undisclosed material connections
5. Unverified statistics or study references
6. AI-generated content that a reasonable person would want disclosed
For each: quote it, explain the risk, give a compliant rewrite that keeps the persuasive intent.
Then write the standing rules I should add to my AI project instructions so my next draft starts compliant.
Be conservative. You are not my lawyer and neither am I. Flag anything borderline and let me get advice.
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every [bracketed] placeholder with your own details first, then review the edited prompt before you send it.